HMRC's Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process was introduced over a decade ago, the intention being to provide an 'alternative' cost-effective method for dealing with disputes between taxpayers and HMRC. ADR is a free service, although taxpayers can involve a professionally accredited mediator from outside HMRC at their own cost.
The ADR process
The process allows for the involvement of a trained ‘facilitator’, who works with both parties to resolve the dispute. The idea is that in a stalemate situation an independent facilitator acts as a neutral third-party mediator.
As has long been the case, the 'independent' mediator is an HMRC officer who has been specifically trained, from a different team within HMRC having had no prior involvement with the case. Mediation meetings default to either video or telephone, therefore any taxpayer who wishes to conduct a meeting in person will need to make representations to the mediator early in the process.
An application for a case to be considered is made online and may be made at any time, although it is more appropriate to apply once all the facts of a case have been established and an impasse has been reached between the two parties. Either HMRC or the customer can suggest the use of ADR. The dispute is then referred to the mediator who will decide whether the case is suitable for ADR within 30 days.
What types of dispute can be raised?
HMRC does not offer ADR in specific instances such as debt recovery or automatic late payment penalties, high income child benefit charges, tax credits, PAYE coding notices, disagreements regarding a point of law or cases where HMRC criminal investigators are involved. HMRC will not usually allow mediation in disputes on the same issue as one that it is intending or has taken before the Tribunal.
If the dispute cannot be resolved through mediation, then the formal internal review process, or an appeal to the Tribunal, may be used instead.
Benefits of ADR
The primary benefit is the reduction in cost for both parties. It also allows both parties to step back, reassess the situation and, with the help of a trained facilitator, attempt to resolve the issue without the added stress and cost of going to a Tribunal.
Another significant advantage is the time it saves. By using ADR, the back-and-forth of letters between the taxpayer and HMRC is eliminated, and a clear timetable for the process is established. The expectation is that a case accepted for ADR will be settled, or at least be out of the ADR process, within four months, making the process more efficient and productive for both parties. To meet this expectation, both the taxpayer and HMRC must commit to providing information requested by the mediator within 15 days. Where HMRC needs to obtain approval for any settlement agreed at the mediation, this must be done within a week of the meeting.
A ‘dedicated helpline’ is available to provide support and guidance throughout the ADR process. This helpline is intended to speed up the service and to be an introduction to the process. Taxpayers who may be considering applying for ADR but are unsure whether their specific case fits the criteria, can speak to a qualified member of the ADR team and be advised accordingly. The ‘dedicated helpline’ is not intended to answer questions relating to a specific case but to advise whether the procedure is suitable for the caller's particular problem.
Alternative Dispute Resolution - is it worth using? | Go Figure Financial | Bookkeeping Services Manchester
Comments